A Conversation about AI and the Future of Publishing
This interview brings together publishing professionals Thad McIlroy and Brian Schwartz for a lively discussion about the intersection of artificial intelligence and the ever-evolving landscape of book publishing. McIlroy, a prolific author and expert in both publishing and technology, shares his experiences writing and self-publishing a book about AI using the iterative platform Leanpub. This platform allows him to constantly update his book with new information and reader feedback, ensuring its relevance in a rapidly changing field.
Schwartz raises concerns about the potential impact of AI on the overall quality of books, given the ease with which content can be generated. McIlroy acknowledges this concern, pointing to the emergence of “junk books” on platforms like Amazon. However, he argues that discerning readers and Amazon’s review system, which he sees as a generally reliable indicator of quality, can help filter out poorly written books, whether AI-generated or not.
Both agree that AI should be viewed as a powerful tool for authors, not a replacement for human creativity and expertise. McIlroy highlights the value of AI in generating ideas, assisting with research, and streamlining workflows, citing Perplexity as a particularly useful tool for research that, while not perfect, offers a starting point for authors. He emphasizes the importance of human oversight in evaluating and editing AI-generated content, as it is prone to inaccuracies and “hallucinations”— instances where the AI generates false or nonsensical information.
The conversation then turns to the legal and ethical considerations of AI use, particularly concerning copyright. Dumouchel voices concern about the ownership of AI-generated content. McIlroy clarifies that 100% AI-generated content is not copyrightable, according to the Copyright Office. However, if an author edits and modifies AI-generated material, incorporating their own ideas and style, they can then claim copyright. McIlroy argues that detecting AI-generated content in published work would be nearly impossible in such cases.
The speakers discuss the importance of “prompting” when working with AI, comparing it to training an intern. By giving the AI clear instructions, context, and even a “persona” to inhabit, authors can guide its output and produce more relevant and engaging content.
The interview concludes with a discussion on the future of AI in publishing. Schwartz expresses concern about the potential cost of AI tools, speculating that the current “golden era” of free or low-cost access might soon end. He predicts that AI services will eventually come at a premium, making access a potential barrier for some authors and publishers. McIlroy offers a counterpoint, suggesting that competition, open-source models, and rapid technological advancements will help keep AI tools affordable and accessible. McIlroy reminds listeners that we are still in the very early stages of AI development, suggesting that current limitations and challenges will likely be overcome as the technology improves.
Ultimately, the interview presents a balanced perspective on the transformative potential of AI in publishing. The speakers acknowledge both the opportunities and challenges presented by this rapidly evolving technology, encouraging listeners to approach AI as a powerful tool that, when wielded thoughtfully and ethically, can enhance creativity, productivity, and access to information. The speakers emphasize that success in the age of AI will depend on a combination of human ingenuity and technological innovation.
(And yes, while humans created this podcast, AI generated the transcript and provided this thorough summary).